Rheingold in Seattle
Greer Grimsley as Wotan (photo Alan Alabastro) |
In place of crocodiles and blow jobs, director Stephen
Wadsworth gives us a spear and a rainbow bridge and chain-mail headgear, as
well as various other items and situations that can be encountered in Wagner's
libretto. This, of course, is not necessarily a desideratum in its own right; a
by-the-books approach is perfectly capable of being dull and predictable. But
it does clear the decks, as it were, for some uncluttered attention on the
musical and dramatic specifics of the work. And a director as brilliantly
sensitive as Wadsworth can bring out worlds of emotion and moral complexity
without resorting to shock tactics or cheap symbolism.
The Rheingold that opened the first cycle
on Sunday night focused chiefly on two themes that will resonate throughout the
ensuing operas: love, and the intricate moral calculus underlying the entire
drama. The portrayal of Wotan and Fricka's relationship — sexy, profound, and
prickly — is one of the great triumphs of Wadsworth's staging, especially in
the extraordinarily nuanced and sure-footed performances by Greer Grimsley and
Stephanie Blythe. These two share a deep bond whose vicissitudes have nothing
to do with henpeckery or ball-and-chain cliches.
At the beginning of Scene 2, Fricka wakes her husband from
sleep with a long, impassioned kiss that stiffens his entire body (no blow jobs
here, but at least one implied boner); and the pride with which she gazes on
the new-built Valhalla carries a poignant suggestion that there was a time, at
least, when this was a shared project between them. What subsequently happens
to that feeling, and to the changing emotional tenor of their long marriage,
has its roots in that first scene.
The other thing Wadsworth zeroes in on is the moral
imbalance unleashed by the chain of thefts in Rheingold —
Alberich from the Rhinemaidens, Wotan from Alberich. Four years ago, Wadsworth
had Fricka stay behind as the other gods passed into Valhalla, mourning the
corpse of Fasolt as the first in a series of victims of the ring's curse. This
time, Loge joins her, expostulating silently about the urgent need to get the
ring back into the Rhine now. I'm not sure I quite buy this
idea, which is at odds with Loge's studied cynicism, but it adds an interesting
layer to the scene.
On top of the precision and specificity of Wadsworth's
Personenregie, there is the utter visual beauty of this
production — the gleaming greens and blacks of Thomas Lynch's mountaintop sets,
Peter Kaczorowski's expressive lighting and the sumptuous colors of the late
Martin Pakledinaz's costumes. After the final notes of the opera and before the
actual bows begin, the curtain rises on a magnificent tableau, with the entire
cast splayed across the stage with all the glamour and care of a Vanity Fair
cover. It's pure delight.
Grimsley and Blythe were the vocal as well as dramatic stars
of Sunday's performance, turning in performances of effortless power and tonal elegance.
Richard Paul Fink, Seattle's Alberich since seemingly forever, returned in all
his dark-toned malevolence, and there were superb contributions by Mark
Schowalter as Loge, Wendy Bryn Harmer as Freia and Ric Furman as a
clarion-voiced Froh.
The weak spot in the Seattle Ring has
always been the conducting, which has never quite measured up to what was on
stage. After his splendid San Francisco Symphony debut in October, I was hoping
Asher Fisch might be the one to break that curse, but his efforts were
inconsistent; there was some fine orchestral work (especially during Donner's
mustering of the storm clouds), but rhythmically the performance tended to be a
little sluggish. Perhaps that will improve as the week progresses.
7 Comments:
Asher Fisch's Parsifal ten years ago in Seattle was well-conducted, ISTR, so I figured the conducting would be good this time around.
This is theoretically the last bring-up of the production, but I'm wondering whether Seattle will bring it back again, given that their current financial situation doesn't suggest that they have the money around for a new production in four or five years. Have you heard anything?
P. S. Wish I were there but it is impossible for me to get to Seattle for a while week, though I am daydreaming about a quick trip to see one or maybe two of the opera.
Forgot to say - doesn't Loge promise the Rheinmaidens the ring back at some point in Rheingold? Am I hallucinating? That could justify his lingering in the last scene.
Oh sure, he says the Rhinemaidens should get their gold back, but Loge says lots of things. Who believes he actually means it?
True, true, but Loge also has a better grasp of the consequences of action or inaction than anyone else in Rheingold. So perhaps I will take a look at the libretto and see whether I believe what he says about this.
Well, when Fasolt demands the Ring as part of the payment for Freia, Loge argues that it can't be part of the ransom, since he already promised to return it to the Rheinmaidens. But Loge is also pretty mocking towards the Rheinmaidens at the end of the opera, so having Loge be so concerned about returning it is probably against the text. They're a sorry excuse, all them gods, so I wouldn't be much convinced by any expressions of selfless sympathy from any of 'em.
Halfway through, and this Ring is all about, for me, very beautiful singing, with sometimes revelatory clarity: the sheer accuracy of pitches and rhythms, the deeply considered phrasing and dynamics, the incredible acoustics of McCaw Hall The direction/acting is, to me, rather pedestrian, (compared to the sublime singing), but I'll say this about the production - it lets sing.
Fine moments from the principals of the orchestra, including cello, bass clarinet, bass trumpet!
Fisch seems to have his hands full directing traffic. But hoo boy, that was some undistinguished orchestral playing, on the whole.
sorry, that should have read, RE the production: "...it lets the singers sing."
Post a Comment
<< Home